Buy on Amazon
£449
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1008 days newer than Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 50% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 3 1300X - 63 vs 42 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£449
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900K (base stroke: 3.70GHz; socket: LGA1200; 125W) box, BX8070110900K
Buy for £449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
