Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 2226 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 17% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Phenom X4 9550 - 242 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 53 vs 95 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
242
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
46.33663366336634%
Multi-Core
712
83.37236533957847%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Agena | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |