Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 1583 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 95 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 8% better in Dirt 5 than Phenom II X4 810 - 143 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
Deneb | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 220 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |