Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1757 days newer than FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-9590 - 231 vs 230 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 54 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £59.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
220 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |