Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 231 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 3% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-8320 - 61 vs 59 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
61
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.31/FPS
100%
Price, £
£141
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £141 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32812 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |