Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 222 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 120 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75098 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |