Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 303 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320E - 188 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 91 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |