Buy on Amazon
£108.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms FX-8320E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1589 days newer than FX-8320E.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 8% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8320E - 487 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Intel Core i5-9400F 2.9GHz LGA1151 9M Cache BOX CPU
Buy for £108.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
FX-8320E
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320E | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
