Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2552 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than FX-8300 - 725 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for £565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |