Buy on Amazon
£29
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470S outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470S is 144 days older than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8300 - 277 vs 274 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
277
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3470S - i5-3470S
Buy for £29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i5-3470S
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470S |
|---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
