Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1910 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-8120 - 186 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |