Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3550H is 2643 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-8120 - 148 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 5 3550H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3550H |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 15.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
