Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1208 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 23 than Pentium G6950 - 150 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
150
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.33/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Clarkdale |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |