Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 794 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 3% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6200 - 60 vs 58 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
60
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |