Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7500T outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7500T is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-7500T - £35.24 vs £66.92
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Performs up to 159% better in League of Legends than FX-6100 - 127 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 26% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-6100 - £0.53 vs £0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£66.92
52%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £66.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |