Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - £35.24 vs £140.07
- Up to 73% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-11500 - £0.2 vs £0.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 6% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-6100 - 188 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.75/FPS
26%
Price, £
£140.07
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £140.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |