Buy on Amazon
£35.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4300 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4300 is 377 days newer than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6100 - 108 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than FX-6100 - £24.62 vs £35.24
- Up to 30% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6100 - £0.23 vs £0.33 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 CPU Used 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop Processor 3.3 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9749 minutes ago
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
108
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£24.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9749 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
