Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - £59.97 vs £176.89
- Up to 26% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-10500 - £1.22 vs £1.65 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 118% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-4350 - 107 vs 49 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
49
45.794392523364486%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1827 minutes ago
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.65/FPS
73.93939393939394%
Price, £
£176.89
33%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-10500 (base clock: 3.10GHz; socket: LGA1200; 65Watt) box
Buy for £176.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
