Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - £59.97 vs £179.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10500 - £0.39 vs £1.07 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-4350 - 169 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
169
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.07/FPS
36%
Price, £
£179.99
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for £179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |