Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2558 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6350 - 177 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - £49.99 vs £179.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-10500 - £0.3 vs £1.02 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
177
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.02/FPS
29%
Price, £
£179.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for £179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10500 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |