Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2633 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £59.97 vs £2378.05
- Up to 96% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £0.25 vs £5.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 68% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4350 - 399 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 64 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
237
59.3984962406015%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39112 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
399
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.96/FPS
4.194630872483222%
Price, £
£2378.05
2%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (32C/64T, 144 MB Cache, up to 4.2 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £2,378.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
