Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2401 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £59.97 vs £2798.0
- Up to 98% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - £0.34 vs £15.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 5% better in Stray than FX-4350 - 185 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 64 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
176
95.13513513513514%
Value, £/FPS
£0.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40051 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£15.12/FPS
2.248677248677249%
Price, £
£2798
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for £2,798 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40051 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |