Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 138 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FX-4100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
