Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 349 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 12% better in War Thunder than EPYC 7742 - 188 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.96/FPS
100%
Price, £
£180.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £180.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rome | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |