Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 561 days newer than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600K - 64 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than EPYC 75F3 - 192 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 75F3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.23/FPS
100%
Price, £
£236.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £236.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 14 |
64 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |