Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms EPYC 75F3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 130 days older than EPYC 75F3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 75F3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than EPYC 75F3 - 142 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 75F3 - 105 vs 280 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
142
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.44/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 75F3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 12 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |