Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms EPYC 7502P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1532 days newer than EPYC 7502P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7502P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900K - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than EPYC 7502P - 200 vs 189 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7502P doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
200
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.17/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7502P | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |