Buy on Amazon
£125.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 587 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than EPYC 7302P - 163 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£125.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11400 (2.6 GHz / 4.4 GHz, 12M Cache)
Buy for £125.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
