Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 881 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 55% better in FIFA 23 than EPYC 7302P - 217 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 60 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-12100
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 60 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
