Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 475 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 0% better in The Outer Worlds than EPYC 7302P - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Rome | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
