Buy on Amazon
£60
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 32 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - £60.0 vs £799.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i9-10940X - £0.47 vs £5.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 16% better in HITMAN 2 than Athlon 3000G - 149 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 28 vs 4 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Athlon 3000G Processor with Radeon Vega 3 Graphics (2C/4T, 3.5 GHz Base Clock)
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10940X Desktop Processor 14 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W, BX8069510940X
Buy for £799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Picasso | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
