Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 670 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £86.0 vs £603.42
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Athlon 200GE - 317 vs 302 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 24 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for £86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Buy for £603.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
51.417004048582996%
Multi-Core
1857
18.51445663010967%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |