Key Differences
In short — Velztorm Galax CTO SFF outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Velztorm Galax CTO SFF Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 183 vs 177 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
2nd Variation
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
Radeon RX 6900 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
63%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
79%
Multi-Core
10263
66%
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
Velztorm Galax CTO SFF Gaming Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
Radeon RX 6900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
4 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |