Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Intel NUC 12 outperforms the cheaper Vibox III-165 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Intel NUC 12 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 31% better in Rocket League than Vibox III-165 - 375 vs 286 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing Rocket League than Vibox III-165 - £2.73 vs £3.23 per FPS
Advantages of Vibox III-165 Gaming PC
- Up to 10% cheaper than Intel NUC 12 - £924.95 vs £1023.20
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Intel NUC 12 Gaming PC NUC12SNKi7 Mini PC Intel Core i7-12700H | 14 Cores/20 Threads | ARC A770 Graphics, Connectivity 6 USB-A, 2 USB-C, 1 HDMI, 2 Display Ports(32GB RAM 2TB SSD)
Buy for £1,023.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Vibox III-165 Gaming PC - Eight Core Intel i7 9700 Processor - Nvidia RTX 4060 8GB Graphics Card - 32GB RAM - 1TB SSD - Windows 11 - WiFi
Buy for £924.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Arc A770
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Intel NUC 12 Gaming PC | vs | Vibox III-165 Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| Arc A770 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
