Key Differences
In short — Vibox III-165 outperforms the cheaper ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Vibox III-165 Gaming PC
- Performs up to 32% better in World of Warcraft than ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming - 141 vs 107 FPS
Advantages of ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC
- Up to 54% cheaper than Vibox III-165 - £429.99 vs £924.95
- Up to 39% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Vibox III-165 - £4.02 vs £6.56 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £924.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5012 minutes ago
Buy for £429.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5011 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
45%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Vibox III-165 Gaming PC | vs | ACEMAGICIAN [Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10700F | CPU | Ryzen 9 6900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | Radeon 680M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
