Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Beelink SER7 Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 7840HS (8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz) Mini on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 227% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Beelink SER7 Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 7840HS (8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz) Mini - 147 vs 45 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
45
31%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Radeon 780M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
59%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
31%
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
100%
Multi-Core
15636
100%
CPU Winner
Beelink SER7 Mini-PC, Ryzen 7 7840HS (8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz) Mini Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| Radeon 780M | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
