Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Ankermann Raytracing Gamer V2 | Intel Core i7-11700F | GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | 32GB RAM | 1000GB NVMe M.2 SSD | WILDRABBIT AERO Case | 750W be quiet! | Win 11 | W-LAN/WiFi on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 55% better in F1 23 than Ankermann Raytracing Gamer V2 | Intel Core i7-11700F | GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | 32GB RAM | 1000GB NVMe M.2 SSD | WILDRABBIT AERO Case | 750W be quiet! | Win 11 | W-LAN/WiFi - 221 vs 143 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2773
100%
Multi-Core
15748
100%
CPU Winner
Ankermann Raytracing Gamer V2 | Intel Core i7-11700F | GeForce RTX 4060 8GB | 32GB RAM | 1000GB NVMe M.2 SSD | WILDRABBIT AERO Case | 750W be quiet! | Win 11 | W-LAN/WiFi PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11700F | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
