Key Differences
In short — ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation outperforms shinobee High End on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 204% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than shinobee High End - 222 vs 73 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2327
88%
Multi-Core
10019
65%
ADAMANT CUSTOM 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC | vs | shinobee High End Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i9-11900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB SSD + 4 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
