Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation outperforms CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 15% better in Counter-Strike 2 than CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR - 427 vs 371 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
427
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Nov 4th, 2021 • 22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
186.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
532.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Nov 4th, 2021 • 22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
60%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Nov 4th, 2021 • 22nd Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
97%
Multi-Core
14881
96%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC | vs | CyberpowerPC Gamer Xtreme VR Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
