Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation outperforms CSL on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC
- Performs up to 160% better in Battlefield V than CSL - 224 vs 86 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
224
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CSL Gaming PC
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
186.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
532.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CSL Gaming PC
7th Variation
Radeon RX 6500 XT
4 GB GDDR6 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
48%
Texel Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
34%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Modelling Rendering Media Workstation Computer PC | vs | CSL Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | GPU | Radeon RX 6500 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 4 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
