Key Differences
In short — TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 outperforms HP Omen 16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 61% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than HP Omen 16 - 37 vs 23 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
27th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
27th Variation
Core i9-12900
2.4 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2473
94%
Multi-Core
13044
88%
HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
6 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16.1" | Screen Size | 15.6" |