The Radeon RX 6800 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's £18.25 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6800
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 2% cheaper – £836.88 vs £855.13
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 250 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon RX 6800 is better in every way
Radeon RX 6800 vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
143
100%
Min 1% FPS
86
100%
Price, £
£836.88
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.85/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£836.88
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£605.36
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,708.73
In Stock
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
47%
Min 1% FPS
33
38%
Price, £
£855.13
97%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
46%
Radeon RX 6800 vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6800 vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6800 vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6800
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
202.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
505.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
16.17 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
32%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
32%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6800 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 28th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| $579.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
250 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
202.1 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
505.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
16.17 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
