The Radeon RX 6700 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only £54.83 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 230 vs 275 Watts
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 6% cheaper – £844.17 vs £899.00
Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Average FPS
124
100%
Min 1% FPS
72
100%
Price, £
£899
93%
Value, £/FPS
£7.25/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£899.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£499.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£899.95
In Stock
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
54%
Min 1% FPS
33
46%
Price, £
£844.17
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.59/FPS
58%
Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Mar 3rd, 2021
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
13.21 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
39%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
39%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6700 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 3rd, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
$479.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Navi II | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
230 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
Memory | ||
12 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
165.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
413 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
13.21 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |