The Radeon RX 6650M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 120 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon RX 6650M is better in every way
Radeon RX 6650M vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650M
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
96
100%
Min 1% FPS
53
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
70%
Min 1% FPS
33
62%
Price, £
£855.13
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6650M vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650M vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650M vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650M
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
58%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.659 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
41%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
59%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
59%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
270.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
8.659 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
