The Radeon RX 6600M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 100 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon RX 6600M is better in every way
Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6600M
May 31st, 2021
Average FPS
95
100%
Min 1% FPS
52
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
71%
Min 1% FPS
33
63%
Price, £
£855.13
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6600M vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6600M
May 31st, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
58%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.659 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
41%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
59%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
59%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6600M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 31st, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
270.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
8.659 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
