The Radeon RX 6500 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce 210 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only £156.71 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6500 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 0 GB
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 82% cheaper – £34.99 vs £191.70
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 31 vs 107 Watts
Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce 210 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, £
£191.7
18%
Value, £/FPS
£2.59/FPS
34%
Buy on Amazon
£191.70
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£276.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£174.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£203.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£34.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£169.88
In Stock
Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce 210 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce 210 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce 210 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
143.9 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.765 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
4%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
2%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
1%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6500 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi II | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 107 W | Power Consumption | 31 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 0.5 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
143.9 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
90.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 2.08 GPixel/s |
180.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 4.16 GTexel/s |
5.765 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.36 GFLOPS |
