The GeForce 210 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650 XT and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only £384.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce 210
- Up to 92% cheaper – £34.99 vs £419.00
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 31 vs 176 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 0 GB
GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Buy on Amazon
£34.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£39.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£161.94
In Stock
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, £
£419
8%
Value, £/FPS
£3.91/FPS
22%
Buy on Amazon
£419.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£412.49
In Stock
GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce 210 vs Radeon RX 6650 XT in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce 210
Oct 12th, 2009
Memory
0.5 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
2%
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
1%
FP32
39.36 GFLOPS
0%
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce 210 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2009 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
31 W | Power Consumption | 176 W |
| Memory | ||
| 0.5 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 6.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 280.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 168.6 GPixel/s |
| 4.16 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 337.3 GTexel/s |
| 39.36 GFLOPS | FP32 | 10.79 TFLOPS |
