The Radeon R9 Nano is a faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 Nano
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 175 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Average FPS
72
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
93%
Min 1% FPS
33
89%
Price, £
£855.13
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 Nano vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 Nano
Aug 27th, 2015
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
256 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.192 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
62%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 Nano | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| HBM | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 4096-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
256 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
8.192 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
