The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3090 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only £710.37 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 45% cheaper – £855.13 vs £1565.50
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 275 vs 350 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 8 GB
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 3090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
41%
Min 1% FPS
33
33%
Price, £
£855.13
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
76%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Average FPS
162
100%
Min 1% FPS
99
100%
Price, £
£1565.5
54%
Value, £/FPS
£9.66/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£1,565.50
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,900.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£2,302.67
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 3090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
41%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
34%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
29%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
14%
GeForce RTX 3090
Sep 1st, 2020
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
936.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
35.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2020 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 350 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 936.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 556 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 35.58 TFLOPS |
