The Radeon R9 280 is a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 3200. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 280
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 68% less energy – 65 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 3 GB
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Average FPS
53
100%
Min 1% FPS
24
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Average FPS
49
92%
Min 1% FPS
21
88%
Price, £
£129.04
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.63/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 280 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 280
Mar 4th, 2014
Memory
3 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
240 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.344 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Jul 2nd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
69%
Texture Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
40%
FP32
1.658 TFLOPS
50%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 280 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
| $279.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 200 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
29.86 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 20.72 GPixel/s |
104.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 41.44 GTexel/s |
3.344 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.658 TFLOPS |
