The Radeon Pro 5300M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6900 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon Pro 5300M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 85 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6900 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 4 GB
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Average FPS
63
38%
Min 1% FPS
31
30%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
102
100%
Price, £
£541.14
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.25/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£541.14
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,184.08
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£752.57
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,101.83
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£1,549.01
In Stock
Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro 5300M vs Radeon RX 6900 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro 5300M
Nov 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
38%
Pixel Fillrate
40 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
100 GTexel/s
14%
FP32
3.2 TFLOPS
14%
Radeon RX 6900 XT
Oct 28th, 2020
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.04 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro 5300M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $999.00 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 300 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 40 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 288 GPixel/s |
| 100 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 720 GTexel/s |
| 3.2 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.04 TFLOPS |
